Climate change is real, for it is the result of war & weather manipulation practiced since at least the 1950s. Rather than point to the problem, it is being used to put in place world governance principally by the Vatican’s influence on world policies & sciences. Climate change & migration are two policies resulting in the demolition of the capitalist protestant model leading to Marxist (catholic) socialism.
Biden claims ‘blessing’ from Pope Francis, says he wants to work together on ‘welcoming immigrants & addressing climate change’
“The President-elect thanked His Holiness for extending blessings and congratulations,” Biden’s Transition Team tweeted on Thursday, adding that he looks forward to working together with the Pope on issues such as “caring for the marginalized and the poor, addressing the crisis of climate change, and welcoming and integrating immigrants and refugees into our communities.”
“The President-elect thanked His Holiness for extending blessings and congratulations,” Biden’s Transition Team tweeted on Thursday, adding that he looks forward to working together with the Pope on issues such as “caring for the marginalized and the poor, addressing the crisis of climate change, and welcoming and integrating immigrants and refugees into our communities.”
Matteo Bruni, the Vatican’s press secretary, confirmed on Thursday that a telephone conversation between the pontiff and Biden took place, but gave no further details. Instead, Vatican News quoted extensively from the November 7 letter from the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, congratulating Biden as the “second US president to profess the Catholic faith” after John F. Kennedy.
The bishops have faced some backlash over the letter, since the US election is yet to be officially certified and President Donald Trump is currently mounting a series of legal challenges to vote-counting in several states.
Regardless of how the US electoral drama turns out in the end, there is no denying a political overlap between the Democrats and Pope Francis, however. Just last month, in his third encyclical, the pontiff denounced free markets and railed against populism, nationalism, war, social-media divisiveness, the death penalty and social injustice. He also called for “open societies that integrate everyone,” and doubled down on his previous views about the benefits of immigration.Democrats have shrugged off all claims of fraud or irregularities, acting as if Biden’s victory was a done deal and setting up a transition team that has reached out to foreign leaders, among other things.
Ownership of private property “can only be considered a secondary natural right,” secondary to the “universal destination of the earth’s goods” and the “right of all to their use,” the Pope wrote.
He was criticized, however, for being insufficiently woke and titling the encyclical “Fratelli Tutti” (Brothers All) – a reference to the words of his namesake St. Francis of Assisi – thereby supposedly excluding and offending women.
Biden administration’s climate agenda reflects spirit of Laudato Si
There is no greater threat to life — human and nonhuman alike — than global climate change. As I have argued before, advocacy on behalf of discrete human populations, such as the unborn or the elderly, will prove futile if there is no habitable planet on which such people can live and upon which all living creatures depend for life. Such uncritical advocacy is like being “pro-fish” by removing them from a lake in which a predator has threatened their survival only to toss them ashore, leaving them to suffocate and die in an environment that is incapable of sustaining their life.
While the outgoing Trump administration has demonstrated nothing but disdain for human and nonhuman life other than its own, the incoming Biden administration is offering us a small sliver of pro-life hope when it comes to climate change, which should be supported and celebrated by Catholics.
The stark contrast between the two approaches to governance is seen in numerous areas, not the least of which is the polar-opposite perspectives each administration has of the 2015 Paris Agreement. The Trump administration provided the requisite one-year written notice of its intention to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate accord, an action that went into effect on Nov. 4, 2020 — the day after the presidential election. President-elect Joe Biden has vowed to rejoin the agreement on his first day as president.
The secretary general of the United Nations, António Guterres, recently stated in an interview that, given the disproportionate power and impact of the United States, humanity’s survival would be “impossible” without American participation and leadership in the global effort against climate change. Additionally, the United States is the second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases after China, which places a greater spotlight on its international responsibility to model alternative policies and practices to reduce carbon emissions.
One of the most promising signs of the Biden administration’s seriousness in resuming the United States’ global leadership role has been the announcement of former Secretary of State John Kerry as “special presidential envoy for climate,” which is a newly created cabinet-level position that also includes a place in the president’s important National Security Council. The choice of Kerry — who is, like Biden, also a Roman Catholic — reflects the incoming administration’s prioritizing of the existential threat climate change poses not only to the future of life on this planet, but also the national security risks such changes pose in the interim.
While serving as President Barack Obama’s secretary of state, Kerry helped negotiate the Paris Agreement. Since his departure from public office in 2016, Kerry has worked to organize a bipartisan domestic and international coalition called “World War Zero” designed to increase awareness of the rising threat of climate change while also enlisting experts to help strategize best responses.
Unlike the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, whose elected leadership signaled a continued desire to push an adversarial and partisan culture-war agenda in its collective engagement with the Biden administration, Pope Francis, in his congratulatory call to Biden last month, emphasized areas of common ground between the church’s social teaching and the Biden administration’s priorities, including “addressing the crisis of climate change.”
Francis, who played a significant spiritual and nongovernmental role in promoting the Paris Agreement in 2015, issued his influential encyclical letter “Laudato Si’, on Care for Our Common Home” the same year. The pope has recently renewed his call for nations to adhere to the Paris Agreement, stating in September, “We need to do everything in our capacity to limit global average temperature rise under the threshold of 1.5°C enshrined in the Paris Climate Agreement, for going beyond that will prove catastrophic, especially for poor communities around the world.”
The incoming Biden administration appears poised to implement many of the policies and practices that align with Francis’ repeated calls for personal and collective “ecological conversion” as expressed in Laudato Si’. With Kerry as the lead American diplomat charged with overseeing and implementing the administration’s proposed climate plan, I have hope that progress is possible in response to this existential threat, provided climate deniers, anti-intellectual Republicans, and fossil-fuel industries are kept at bay.
Last week, economist and journalist Nishan Degnarain wrote a lengthy article in Forbes in which he listed 10 actions the climate envoy can take to win the climate war. The article is well-argued and outlines both the opportunities and pitfalls that face the incoming climate envoy.
It got me thinking about the Catholic perspective and the many ways in which the impending administrative changes align well with the vision outlined in Laudato Si’. There are many resonances, but here I want to offer an illustrative set of five key alignments.
Taking science seriously: One of the hallmarks of Laudato Si’ is the way in which it frankly and responsibly draws on the best of scientific evidence for “what is happening to our common home,” as the first chapter describes it. The Biden administration shares with Francis a commitment to taking seriously scientific research and data. Unlike the Trump administration’s overt antagonism toward science and promotion of a dangerous culture of anti-intellectualism, the incoming Biden administration embraces expertise and scientific research in formulating policies and responding to crises.
Environmental justice for poor and marginalized: One of the key themes of Laudato Si’ is that of “integral ecology,” which calls for a paradigm shift in how we approach issues of society and the natural environment, recognizing their inherent relationship and interconnectedness. The Biden administration’s proposed climate plan is titled “Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution and Environmental Justice.” Citing recent atrocities like the water crisis in Flint, Michigan, the plan explicitly acknowledges how climate change and pollution disproportionately affect poor and minoritized communities and the need to correct such injustices.
Intergenerational solidarity: Francis builds on the work of his pontifical predecessors when he writes in Laudato Si’: “Intergenerational solidarity is not optional, but rather a basic question of justice, since the world we have received also belongs to those who will follow us.” Anyone who has seen the powerfully symbolic image of then-Secretary of State Kerry signing the Paris Agreement on behalf of the United States will recall that he held his 2-year-old granddaughter on his lap, signaling the importance of this global pact as a matter of justice for future generations.
International collaboration: The Biden administration’s plan and appointment of Kerry signal another resonance with Francis’ repeated call for “dialogue on the environment in the international community.” The outgoing Trump administration has spent four years dislodging the U.S. from international collaborations, from the Paris Agreement to the World Health Organization, to both American and international detriment. Returning America to the international stage will strengthen partnerships necessary to respond to the existential climate threat as well as other crises that will inevitably arise.
Economy in dialogue for human fulfillment: Finally, in Laudato Si’, Francis reemphasized the centrality of the common good as the foundational principle of governance and international cooperation. He has written that “profit cannot be the sole criterion” when it comes to decision making, but that concern for the environment and “the most vulnerable members of society” should be key. The Biden administration has proposed a number of “clean energy” and economic initiatives aimed at sustaining dialogue between the economy and the environment, striving to connect our coordinated response to climate change with economic justice and growth.
Daniel P. Horan is the Duns Scotus Professor of Spirituality at Catholic Theological Union in Chicago, where he teaches systematic theology and spirituality.